January 19, 2025: Sunset on a Presidency and an Era

Not to be a negative one, but . . .

It’s cold in Minnesota today. This morning our neighborhood temperatures bottomed out around -12º F, and warmed to around -1º by sunset.  It’s a momentous and memorable day. Something compelled me to take a contemplative walk to absorb the waning moments of daylight fading from peach to a crepuscular blue-green.

Today I saw the sun set on the last full day of the Biden Presidency. I am concerned and frightened by the future that dawns tomorrow. Will people die, species vanish, institutions fail, rights be disregarded or trampled as a consequence of the free election that elevated Trump to his second term as President? Do I worry too much?

I believe Joe Biden is an honorable and decent public servant, whose presidency will be remembered as one of the most consequentially positive and productive of the past century. He espoused principles and policies that let me sleep nights, convinced he had the best interests of the country at heart, transcending party or personal gain. I did not wake every morning to learn of a new outrage of his devising, as was the case with Trump. I also believe Biden was not a perfect man or president. But wherever he fell short of aspirations or ideals, or was blocked by national or international circumstance or political opposition, he chose to act within constitutional constraints this country could rise above and beyond with time, good will, and effort. Not sure if that holds true for the the foreseeable future, let alone the next four years.

My Trump-supporting friends are celebrating and hoping for a new Golden American Age. They seem as outraged by Biden’s policies as I am by Trump’s. They don’t see, or choose not to see, any reason for my sorrow over lost opportunities for progress against climate change and for clean energy jobs and infrastructure. They don’t show concerns for things I cherish that I fear are threatened by the incoming regime’s erosion of values, laws, and regulations for protecting the environment all living things share, or disregard for recognizing, upholding and furthering human rights. They seem to share a collective amnesia for the disasters, setbacks, and injustices of the first Trump era. 

The first four years of the Trump administration convinced me and lots of other folks that Trump was the most dangerous and ill-suited person to hold the office of President in the nation’s history. The world faced two internationally shared crises: Covid and Climate Change. He catastrophically botched both. These things have been debated and documented ad nauseum elsewhere and there most likely wouldn’t be much impact on people’s opinions to discuss it further here. If you truly wonder about his impact on these things, look it up.

My chief concern is what’s currently happening to the environment due to things humans are doing to drastically alter Earth’s climate. Science has known and warned us of the dangers of climate change for over 50 years. Their predictions have proven eerily accurate. If anything, many have fallen conservatively short of weather realities and ecological challenges we now face. Trump denies it’s a problem. His first term opposition to environmental policies, regulations, and incentives resulted in a generational setback to progress on this front. He is currently on record selling his administration’s policy platform to fossil fuel industry “Oiligarchs” in exchange for campaign contributions to “Drill, Baby, drill!”

Many of Trump’s actions and policies fall into a textbook or comic book definition of evil. The problem with describing pure evil is the more accurately you describe what it’s doing and its likely consequences, the more everything you say sounds like hyperbole. That’s part of how Trump got re-elected. Not enough people truly believe or remember that he is as bad as he is. Giving him the reins of power to the world’s most powerful nation threatens the world’s future in so many ways.

So how does a person face and oppose something they find to be evil?

My suggested motto and pair of symbols for the next four years is Infinite Resistance:

∞Ω

This is not like Senator Mitch McConnell’s unconditional opposition to anything Obama proposed in order to maintain a Republican stranglehold on power and hamstring Obama, with the goal of making him a one-term President. This isn’t even really about Trump at all.

This infinite resistance is based on being informed and aware to stand up for what you know to be right and against things you know to be wrong. Truth is not up for grabs and there are no “alternative facts.” Everyone has their own perspectives and priorities of things worth fighting for and against. We simply must not practice the advance acquiescence to Trump shown so far by so many in journalism, technology, and industry, giving Trump tacit carte blanche approval to anything he chooses to do.

In thinking about these things tonight as the sun sets on both the Biden Presidency and on generations of governing where the US President was thought to be accountable to the same laws and constitution as every citizen, it’s easy to feel overwhelmed and too small to make a difference against the power, wealth, and institutions lined up behind and and bowing down to the incoming Trump administration. What is the road ahead?

A wise FB friend and acquaintance posted his concern tonight about what the future may hold, including sharing frustration over how little one person could probably do to influence the coming change and likely chaos. He counseled focusing on the friends, family, and work that really matter to us in life, and work to help others where we are. He also recommended we remember Niebuhr’s Serenity Prayer. This all helps me. Nobody has the energy to be continually outraged or overwhelmed. 

God, grant me the serenity to accept

the things I cannot change, 

the courage to change the things I can,

and the wisdom to know the difference.

But it still feels like we are at important crossroads.

My FB friend also made me wonder if there maybe are a few things people CAN do as individuals to move forward in peace and power. Maybe even in community and in Infinite Resistance:

1) Never allow outrages to be normalized.

2) Speak up when we see injustice.

3) Be a refuge for those who need it.

4) Don’t look the other way.

5) Be informed.

6) Have the humility and empathy that wherever we see hardship and persecution, we know deep within ourselves that “there but for the grace of God go I.”

7) Give serious thought to the wise words my FB friend shared about focusing on friends, family, and work, and helping our communities and those in need, where we are.

8) Brace yourself, but don’t let that immobilize you from needed responses and positive actions.

9) Protest evil and stand and work for something better however it best suits your abilities, imagination, and circumstances.

10) Stand and be counted. You don’t have to be antagonistic to people who may disagree; you do have to be known for your principles. This refutes things that go against your principles, makes some people think, and lets others know you are someone they can confide in.

11) Memorize and live by that serenity prayer.

Amen.

Ω

Here’s tomorrow’s outfit:

Posted in Climate Change Bugs Me, Politics | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Climate Change Bugs Me – #1: Motivating Annoyances

“One person’s death is a tragedy; one million deaths is a statistic.”

This quotation, sometimes attributed to Josef Stalin, is one of the reasons many people have a hard time comprehending, dealing with, or even believing statistics underlying tragedies of massive scope. We don’t like to see anyone suffer, but it’s hard to grasp when the numbers get too big and the events are seemingly distant or difficult enough to be someone else’s problem.

Climate change is one of those issues. We hear of projected deadlines, extinctions, mass migrations, catastrophic storms and droughts, sea levels risings high enough to sink islands or metropolises . . . . And it’s too much.

Most people really have a hard time wrapping their minds around problems of epic global scale and either deny or downplay the risks or get so overwhelmed that they give up and focus on the things that seem most within their spheres of interest and influence.

Some of the things that most effectively cause people to act are little annoyances. If a mosquito bites you, you immediately swat it. If the problem persists in your yard, you put on mosquito repellant, cut the grass, dump out standing water, and put out the citronella candles and mosquito coils before company comes. If, on the other hand, the problem is overwhelming, like say a flock of killer bees, people generally live out the script of a cheesy horror movie, denying the problem or doing ineffectual things that make the problem worse until the terror music comes on and it all ends in screaming mayhem. Not Oscar-worthy maybe, but you get the general picture:

I’m launching a blog series on the theme, “Climate Change Bugs Me.” I want to focus on the local and individual levels of perception and action – the evidence that presents itself, facts and ideas we can explore, and meaningful actions we can take. This is not intended as a substitute for drastic meaningful corporate and governmental actions that must be taken to reduce the global scale and impact of greenhouse gas emissions. I chiefly want to share my personal observations and motivations and how my family and I respond. Hopefully this can be a motivation to pay attention to the precious and potentially all-too-ephemeral world around us, and find their own ways to respond to and act on their own climate realities in their own spheres of influence. In each blog’s conclusion I will suggest one individual action, one source for further study, and one person to know about and follow. I will generally share my own observations and try to keep graphs and links to other sources from my personal information echo-chamber to a minimum. I will also endeavor to keep blogs shorter than this introductory post!

Who am I to write about this? Who is anyone? I am a professional musician, a performing and teaching bassist, a husband, a dad. I earned a DMA (Doctor of Musical Arts) degree from The Peabody Institute of The Johns Hopkins University. I like science and following scientific endeavors and discoveries. I pursued and did well in undergrad pre-med courses and even took organic chemistry while working on my Masters in Music before finally committing to a musical career.

I have also seen how one person can make a difference. The Minnesota Orchestra and St. Paul Chamber Orchestra were both locked out by their respective boards and management teams. They came perilously close to destroying both organizations. I had played in the Honolulu Symphony and seen similar situations decimate one of the oldest and most dedicated orchestras in the US at devastating personal cost to dear friends and talented colleagues. Not wanting to see that happen in Minnesota to my lifelong favorite orchestras, I joined community action groups and was one of a handful of bloggers who helped turn the tide in favor of a now vibrant artistic culture. My first major blog on the topic was a guest blog, What Can One Person Do? on Emily E. Hogstad’s Song of the Lark blog. Emily is the clearest community example of “one person who made a difference” in informing people, ending the lockouts, and fostering an inclusive musical community that actually serves all its stakeholders better than it did before the crisis. One person can make a difference!

Again, who am I to write about this? Who is anyone? If you know a bridge is out around the corner, you don’t need to be a structural engineer to warn others – you would be negligent to defer to greater experts. If you are convinced of potential climate calamity on the road ahead, you don’t have to be an atmospheric scientist to call out warning and suggest alternative, more-survivable, maybe even more life-affirming paths. More on who’s qualified or compelled to speak up in a future blog post.

I would much rather be teaching, performing, and writing about music than writing about climate change. My goal is to blog about how Climate Change Bugs Me at least once a month through the end of 2020, then see that enough people are awake, aware, and acting so I can focus my attentions on my chosen musical career and the life I live with family and friends and nature.

Motivating annoyances that set off this Climate Change Bugs Me blog series:
I see and feel impacts of climate change in my backyard and surroundings that seem so evident. I read articles, reports, and graphs describing the current situation and possible consequences of inaction. All these things that seem so compelling and important to me don’t seem to elicit what seem to be obvious, reasonable individual or societal reactions to a climate that is changing in direct relation to the greenhouse gases we pump into it. Dealing with climate change need not be the sole thing people concern themselves with and talk about, but it should fit somewhere among the priorities of things they think about and act on. I want to focus my written reactions to climate change in this blog, decrease time spent on depressing interactions with social media, and hopefully live to see a world where we have managed to act to minimize, mitigate, and reverse the damage we’ve done to it. We’ve had and ignored full documentation and understanding of what’s going on, basically for the span of my lifetime since December, 1959. I want to do my part to push past the inflection point of inaction and encourage others to do the same.

Something You Can Do:
Test drive an electric car. You don’t have to buy one today, but you owe it to yourself and the planet to learn about the alternatives to your current ICE (Internal Combustion Engine) vehicle. EVs (Electric Vehicles) and PHEV’s (Plugin Hybrid Electric Vehicles) are fun!!! Lots of pickup, very quiet, low maintenance, competitively economical over the long term, and have low emissions approaching zero! We bought a PHEV Chevy Volt last December. My wife drives it to and from work, usually without using a thimbleful of gasoline. Here’s a link to a PDF comparing features of EVs and PHEVs currently available in the Midwest, Wash. DC area, and across the US, compiled by Jukka Kukkonen. This PDF also lists tax credits available for various models. Minnesota’s Governor Tim Walz just announced a “Clean Cars Minnesota” initiative that should mave EVs more available, affordable, and convenient in MN. Last week was National Drive Electric Week, but you don’t have to wait for a national event to try one out. EV owners tend to be friendly and generous in spending time displaying and discussing their vehicles. Keep your eyes peeled for local opportunities to test drive EVs. Some dealerships are knowledgeable and helpful with EV sales; others are less engaged. Call them up and see what they have on their lots. You might find a great new or used deal, and you’ll at least help spread the word that there’s interest and demand for alternatives to the ICE vehicles that currently help melt too much ice, globally.

Someone to follow AND a Good Source of Information:
Dr. Katharine Hayhoe. If you’re not following Dr. Hayhoe on Twitter or subscribed to her YouTube “Global Weirding” series, now would be a good time to start.

Just last week the UN named her “2019 Champion of the Earth,” their highest environmental recognition.

She is currently “a climate scientist, a professor in the Department of Political Science, a director of the Climate Center, and an associate in the Public Health program of the Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Texas Tech University” along with many other associations.

Here’s her thumbnail description of her work:
“My research currently focuses on establishing a scientific basis for assessing the regional to local-scale impacts of climate change on human systems and the natural environment. To this end, I analyze observations, compare future scenarios, evaluate global and regional climate models, build and assess statistical downscaling models, and constantly strive to develop better ways of translating climate projections into information relevant to agriculture, ecosystems, energy, infrastructure, public health, and water resources.”

hayhoe_quote

She respectfully engages people of all backgrounds, across the political spectrum (“A thermometer in not liberal or conservative.”) She has also actively engaged the faith community in discussions of responsible stewardship. (She’s active in her Christian faith community and her husband is a pastor.) Here’s her TED talk on the topic “The most Important Thing You Can do to Fight Climate Change: Talk About It.” It’s a great introductory chat if you haven’t already discovered what an engaging, compelling advocate she is for a liveable planet for everybody for now and the future.

Posted in Climate Change Bugs Me | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Building Equitable Communities – Martin Luther King Jr. Day Reflections on Chamber Music America’s Annual Conference

We’ve been members of Chamber Music America for about a decade. We attended their national conference for the first time this year, just getting home to Minnesota from New York the day before the Martin Luther King Jr. holiday. CMA is the clearing house for all things about Chamber Music in America. They publish a beautiful and informative magazine, have commissioning and residency grants, and publish directories of ensembles, presenters, festivals, and ensembles. They are the sort of organization you’d expect to find catering to any specialized field, chamber music being a rarified example.

Our chief impetus for going was as recipients of their 2018 Classical Composition Commissioning Grant. 217 ensembles applied from across the nation, and we are thrilled to be among the 11 groups awarded a commissioning grant. We are especially excited to have a new piece written for us by Valerie Coleman. Anne Midgette of the Washington Post described Valerie as one of the “Top 35 Female Composers in Classical Music.” She’s an amazing musician with a unique and beautiful compositional voice, and we can hardly wait until the piece is finished and we can take it on the road as the newest part of our repertoire. We went to the conference to learn more about CMA, talk up our new commission, network, and hopefully find new presenters and venues interested in bringing OboeBass! and our music to their concert stages.

Composer, flutist, Imani Winds Founder, Valerie Coleman

We’ve always liked and appreciated CMA, but this year we discovered Chamber Music America is something much more than just another trade organization. They have a mission to make a difference in the world and they are inspirationally effective. In particular, they back up their words about racial equity and inclusion with visionary, meaningful actions and initiatives.

The theme of this year’s conference was “Building Equitable Communities,” with a focus on connecting with previously under-represented populations of music professionals from ALAANA communities (African/Black, Latinx, Asian/South Asian, Arab/Middle Eastern, and Native American). Their full statement of “A Commitment to Diversity, Inclusion and Equity” contains this summarizing paragraph:

“CMA believes that there is a fundamental difference between inviting ALAANA communities into a Western European-based structure and revising the structure itself to include ALAANA musicians, presenters, composers, and others in the field to fully benefit as active participants in the organization. We are committed to the latter, and know that we have a great deal of work to do in order to become a fully inclusive and equitable organization. CMA will undertake this work by seeing diversity, inclusion, and equity as a related set of approaches that build on one another and lead to the fair sharing of the benefits and services that our organization offers.”

Most organizations and institutions seem to have some sort of boilerplate statement of “inclusion” like this, but we’ve never seen it more fully, meaningfully, movingly put into action than in this organization and at this conference. The CMA board, panel discussion, and keynote addresses were primarily led by non-white musical and cultural luminaries, starting with the opening keynote address by Ta-Nehisi Coates. Our flight got us in too late for Ta-Nehisi Coates’s address, but we caught the after-discussion, and attended as broad a mix of the panel discussions and showcase performances as we could through the course of the conference. We found we agreed, disagreed with, and questioned the various speakers and panels about as much as we would have with Caucasian-led panels, but we found we were left with a much higher percentage of challenges to our assumptions and new ideas for moving forward.

Carrie noticed a catchphrase of the conference, “Conflicting Truths,” kept coming back as a transformative concept. “Conflicting Truths” are not necessarily truths that compete for intrinsic supremacy over other truths, but they are truths that often compete for a place at the table, in the classroom, or in the concert hall. The first of these conflicting truths is that both the western canon of classical music and the world of jazz contain some of the most sublime chamber music ever created. CMA has long been a leader in presenting both Jazz and Classical music as co-equal and cross-pollinating branches of chamber music. Until now, however, much of academia and the concert-producing world has skewed toward practices that put the western European tradition on a very high, narrow pedestal that often limits serious consideration of other traditions to the point of exclusion. Both of us have doctorates in music. We’ve studied, practiced, performed and carefully and critically listened to music our entire lives. We rejoice in sharing Mozart’s greatness, and stand by the truth that his music speaks to the universal human condition with transcendent beauty and eloquence. We don’t deny the value of other musics intentionally, but we are realizing with more urgency that our training and backgrounds left us with blindspots, and we have to actively seek and open our ears and minds to other types of music and musicians.

We and most other performers don’t think or act with racist intent, but we are discovering we are sometimes so entrenched on our “side” that we are unaware of the racism we thoughtlessly perpetuate by our learned-to-the-point-of-being-subconscious assumptions. It is clear that a long backlog of little ignorances, oversights, and assumptions have accumulated and allowed a mountain of racist consequences to grow. It’s as imperative as fighting climate change for all of us to stop perpetuating the problems and start working for solutions. As one of the speakers commented, “I want to see the change in MY lifetime.”

Rolf was struck by how “inclusion,” while on its face a positive-sounding force, is only truly meaningful when it became a two-way street, encompassing the concept of “building equitable communities.” “Inclusion” is nice when a community uses it to welcome a new member to the neighborhood. It has a pernicious potential if it includes an underlying assumption that the “welcoming” neighborhood is somehow inherently superior to the neighborhood “the other” came from. We are all the richer if we listen to and learn from other individuals and traditions.

Chamber Music America continues to extol Classical Western Music. We heard ensembles CMA showcased give exquisite performances music of Telemann, Beethoven, Janacek, Ligeti, Brahms – all dead white composers with music of lasting universal significance. Chamber Music America also presented their highest award, the Richard J. Bogomolny National Service Award, to the Association for the Advancement of Creative Music (AACM), a music organization founded over fifty years ago by a mighty handful of Black musicians for the encouragement of experimentation and self realization of jazz musicians. In all our years of academic and musical study, we never heard of this organization or much about its founders, even though it exerted powerful influences of both the jazz and western classical music traditions from the twentieth-century to the present.

Henry Feathergill, interviewed by Larry Blumenfeld

Henry Feathergill, one of the founders of the AACM, gave one of the most moving and funny and inspirational talks about music we have ever heard. He spoke of the founding of the organization, predicated on the idea that all members could share their ideas, and that all other members would do their best to bring the ideas of others to musical fruition, whether or not it was something they particularly cared for or believed in artistically. This democratization of ideas extended to influences. He spoke of playing in Bohemian and Polish polka bands, doing parade music, playing in clubs, and blues and gospel as influences that surrounded them in the Chicago birthplace of the AACM. He also spoke of hearing the Chicago Symphony play under Fritz Reiner, and the Classical new music series that took place blocks from where they presented their jazz programs. They often traded ideas and concert attendance with composers like Varese, Cage, and Hindemith. He extolled both being open to a wide variety of ideas and influences, and in specializing in and mastering a narrow field. Music is and needs all of that. He also spoke of the original impetus we all shared of wanting to become musicians in the first place – the thrill of having music speak to us, and the joy of working together to make it speak to audiences. The chief goal of the artist is to communicate and celebrate the special spark of individuality in each person, The way music binds those individuals into a community civilizes us and makes us better people. The pianist Amina Claudine Meyers and the Jazz Trio of the AACM concluded the award ceremony with some of the most adventurous, avant-garde, and thoroughly compelling chamber music we have ever heard. Pure. Elemental. Fire.

Henry Threadgill with pianist Amina Claudine Meyers and AACM Trio (Adequoke Steve Colson, piano, Reggie Nicholson, drums, and Ernest Dawkins, alto sax). What music would sound like if it was made on the surface of the sun! Joined by CMA Board President, Billy Childs, and Richarda Abrams of AACM, NY.

We met so many people at the conference that exemplified fusing “competing truths” into music that fosters the ideas of equitable communities. Jazz bass giant Rufus Reid attended most of the showcases, jazz, classical, avant-garde, you name it. He has a towering reputation in music and enthused about all the new ideas from all directions he was hearing that would feed his own compositions. The great ones never stop learning, and they are most generous with their time and talents, and gracious about meeting and greeting their fans!

Rolf with bassist/educator/composer Rufus Reid and bassist/clarinetist/composer Tim Goplerud

We also met Meraki, the duo of Anastasia Christofakis, clarinet, and Elizabeth Hill, piano. They were also first-time CMA attendees who won a CMA Classical Commissioning Grant. They will be working with Chickasaw classical composer and pianist, Jerod Impichchaachaaha’ Tate. We had the chance to raise an apricot juice toast to music with them and CMA Classical/Contemporary Program Director, Susan Dadian at Turco Mediterranean Grill. We are inspired by the opportunities we have been given, the music we will be learning and performing, and by the engaging artists of vision and excellence of all stripes that we met and heard at CMA.

Tim Goplerud, Rolf Erdahl and Carrie Vecchione, Susan Dadian, and Meraki – Anastasia Christofakis, clarinet, and Elizabeth Hill, piano

So what are we doing individually and as OboeBass! to build more equitable communities?

  • Step One: Realizing we have a lot more to learn and do than we thought before the conference.
  • Step Two: Teaching. Our educational series include programs that focus on issues of race and music. The Spirit Sings tells the history of African American music, including the evolution of Jazz and the musical and social contributions of great Classical artists like Marian Anderson. Our Classical and Jazzy Nutcracker compares and celebrates Tchaikovsky’s original masterpiece with Duke Ellington’s scintillating Nutcracker Jazz arrangements.
  • Step Three: Getting excited about how we can grow as individuals and an ensemble through opening our awareness to and combatting burdens others face because of race, and through opening our ears to the musical worlds and concepts that come from beyond our training and experience.

We naturally gravitate to music infused with folk elements from around the world. We seek out composers with common interests and abilities for writing that sort of piece. The composer who has written the most music for us is Tim Goplerud. Tim’s first and abiding musical love is jazz, one of the most unique and significant African-American gifts to the world of music. In his formative years, Tim sought out performers in the clubs and studied with African-American visionaries like Muhal Richard Abrams (The founder of AACM). His Scandinavian heritage put no dampers on his ability to love, learn, inherit from, and pass on African-American musical traditions. He had the same classical training we did but learned and incorporated long before us that there was so much more to music than what the conservatories offered and elevated. We chose to seek a commission from Valerie Coleman, not because she’s black or because she’s a woman (though that will undoubtedly bring valuable perspectives to her composition), but because we loved her music. We became fans of Imani Winds, the woodwind quintet Valerie founded. We really liked the pieces she composed and arranged for the quintet. Her compositions have strong roots both in her solid western classical training as well as in the music of Africa and of African-American traditions. These musical strains stand on equal footing in terms of value, significance, and potential to connect with all audiences. Combined they make for richer possibilities of artistic expression. We want to perform more music like this and collaborate with more composers and performers of other traditions.

We are also presenters. Our series of Coffee Concerts at the Lakeville Area Arts Center has included performers of many racial backgrounds, ethnic traditions, and musical specialties. We’ve chosen programs celebrating music of Latin-American, India, the Balkans, and Jazz traditions. Our audiences are still predominantly white. This year we are reaching out to African-American, Asian, and Latin audiences, advertising in publications that serve their communities, meeting social and business groups, and programming literature that reflects their contributions.

One of the treasures we’ve taken away from this conference is the understanding we need to do more, not just to invite other groups to share in what we have to offer musically, but to ask others to share with us their insights, needs, and musical riches that we can learn from. We have music and stories to share; we also want to be better listeners and learners.

What can you do as a reader, musician, or music lover? Educate yourself about music and musicians who were left out of your training or experience. Work from your passions and gifts, the things that grab you as meaningful and important. Demand more from your institutions. Generally, musicians don’t care what color, sex, or shape another musician is so long as they can produce the required virtuosity and collaborative abilities to make great music. Boards and presenters and marketers are much more cautious and less willing to take steps they fear will rock the boat. We’re proud to say The Minnesota Orchestra is one of our local institutions that is making a concerted effort by board, artistic leadership, musicians, audience, and community efforts to reach out to, learn from, demand, and include the music of ALAANA composers in the orchestra’s programming, educational outreach, and hiring. Choosing to act makes a transformative, uplifting difference, for the art, the artists, and for our over-arching crazy quilt of delicious individual differences flavoring our shared humanity.

Let’s all look forward to and work for the day when all of us and all our children play together, and we live in a world where people are not “judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.” In the meantime, let’s look for and exalt the best contents in every character we come across and make beautiful music together!

God has wrought many things out of oppression. He has endowed his creatures with the capacity to create—and from this capacity has flowed the sweet songs of sorrow and joy that have allowed man to cope with his environment and many different situations.

Jazz speaks for life. The Blues tell the story of life’s difficulties, and if you think for a moment, you will realize that they take the hardest realities of life and put them into music, only to come out with some new hope or sense of triumph.

This is triumphant music.

– Martin Luther King Jr.

Posted in OboeBass! Vecchione/Erdahl Duo | 2 Comments

Things to do NOW! (or else?)

I think all the #metoo stuff is important and should be addressed, but there are more critically important policy and activism issues to focus on IN THE COMING FEW DAYS.

The most meaningful work on addressing issues of gender harassment and inequality will be made on a thoughtful, ongoing basis – not in the current climate where it dominates and distracts from other news in a flurry that takes down select scapegoats, while leaving intact existing structures and procedures that facilitated and supported the abuses in the first place. (A couple suggestions for that at the end of this note.)

These are NOT partisan issues. Elements of them will affect every woman, man, and child in America for generations. You should have something to say on these issues and your voice should be heard. The two most immediate issues are NET NEUTRALITY and THE NEW TAX CODE.
 
NET NEUTRALITY.
If you use the internet, you should be concerned about the pending likely loss of Net Neutrality. If you don’t care if you might have to pay more or wait longer for or be denied certain speeds or features of the internet as it is, or if you’re not particularly concerned about issues surrounding free speech contained in the First Amendment of the United States Constititution skip to the next point about the tax bill.

 

Chairman FCC Chairman Pai is working to repeal the long-established, hard-fought-for rules of net neutrality, effectively allowing companies to control your access and speed of internet use depending on how much you pay them for something they didn’t create, and for which you’re already paying handsomely through internet access plans.

FYI, if you didn’t know, the FCC’s proposal to end net neutrality was given the deceptive title, “In the Matter of Restoring Internet Freedom.” This in fact is a blatantly partisan attempt at a power grab that negates net neutrality, frees behemoth corporations that answer only to their stockholders to buy and dispense access at their whim and price tag. It ignores long-standing conventions of fair access to the internet, established by law in 2015 after two decades of deliberation. By “Restoring Internet Freedom” the FCC intends to take away the personal freedoms of the internet to which you have become accustomed. It’s like in the old western movies where the bad guys dammed up and diverted rivers for their own benefit and to starve out settlers.

Until yesterday, Dec. 11, Mr. Pai did not publicly disclose when this vote will be. Turns out the vote will be this Thursday, Dec. 14. This is an unconscionable lack of transparency and accountability to the public he is supposed to be serving. If the plan was fair and reasonable, there would be no need to keep provisions of it secret or for the vote date to be a mystery for such a long time.

Here’s a super quick and effective way to support net neutrality.

1. On a computer, (not your phone!), go to: http://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filings/express
2. Enter (under “Proceeding”) the numbers 17-108.
3. In comments, say you support Title 2 oversight of ISPs. Also say that you support net neutrality.
*Fill in the form carefully; they’ve made it less friendly and impossible to fill in by phone.
*Don’t be silenced. Do it now.
*Copy & Paste and Pass it on.
(Beware the FCC’s post, recently put up on John Oliver’s famous link, http://www.gofccyourself.com It is currently quasi-blocked by the FCC with a Nov. 7 obfuscation that redirects you to download links for all the commentary that has been made, bypassing the ability to actually make direct comments.)

THE NEW TAX CODE

The reconciliation of the tax bills, whether you consider them to be a reform or a heist, contains a very short window of opportunity for the public to become informed and share their views with their Congressional representatives in the House and Senate. Lots of hyperbole is being thrown in all directions, but there are issues that will affect all of us and deserve your consideration and comment:

1) LOSING THE FEDERAL TAX DEDUCTION FOR STATE AND LOCAL TAXES. It can be argued, if you paid for services locally, you saved the Federal Treasury from having to take care of problems in your backyard. States with higher taxes and services should not have to pay for them a second time by losing this Federal deduction.

2) LOSING THE DEDUCTION FOR INDIVIDUAL BUSINESS EXPENSES ON W2 INCOME. Many people and almost all self-employed individuals have high business expenses, often to produce a very slim margin of profit. Losing this, even if a higher individual deduction is provided, will drastically harm many, including the most entrepreneurial and creative segments of society that tend to have the highest return on investment in terms of investment in their communities and employment of others.

3) HIDDEN AGENDAS. There are provisions in the tax bill that attempt to sneak through allowances for oil exploration in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (from Fox News) (from CNN)(from The Hill), effectively repeal the Johnson amendment that currently prohibits non-profit and religious organizations from using tax-deductible donations for campaign or other political purposes, impact premiums for health insurance,  tax graduate students tuition waivers to the detriment of students and schools, disincentivize clean energy, etc. Many of these hidden provisions are plastered over Facebook and elsewhere, some true, some not. Do your research on things that matter to you and make your voice heard. Saying what you think is important IS important.

If you don’t know how to reach your Congressional representatives, here’s a link:
Here’s information on how you can contact the President at the White House:
There are decisions being made in the next few days that may have drastic consequences for how we live, earn, communicate, and exercise free speech in America. If you don’t do something to try to make a difference, you’re part of the problem. Instead, let’s look for and find some solutions we can all live with.
———–
SUGGESTIONS FOR WORKING FOR A MORE EQUITABLE, SAFE, AND RESPECTFUL NATION FOR WOMEN:
1) Instead of saturating the airwaves with the scandal of the moment, establish and hire print, radio, and TV reporting teams committed to researching the issue with regularly scheduled programs. An established reporter core dedicated to the issue could do wonders addressing the issues of gender equality and responsible workplace and societal behaviors.

 

2) Focus on the issues, not the individuals. Hold individuals accountable, but don’t let an opportunity for building lasting improvements and righting old wrongs turn into a media circus.

3) Set standards, don’t seek scapegoats. This is particularly evident in the halls of Congress, where it’s tremendously difficult to file a complaint, and where members apparently are not required to take Title 9 or other training. It’s required at my school for all employees on an annual basis. The classes take time and may not be needed for everyone, but it puts decent, equitable treatment up as a standard. People are put on notice of what constitutes decent behavior, and people who have been abused are empowered to speak up through effective official channels.

4) Keep up the good work making people aware of the problems, but don’t do it at the expense of consideration other critical, time-sensitive issues that are facing the nation.

5) Don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater. I don’t know what Garrison Keillor or Al Franken did or didn’t do. There’s a tremendously short supply of perfect people of any gender, and many of the imperfect ones do worthwhile things in addition to the reprehensible things they may do or may have done in the past. It’s also possible people can learn and grow away from bad behavior. Over-reaction serves nobody, and has the all-too-frequent unintended consequence of eliciting equal and opposite reactions of retrenchment or retaliation.

6) Do due process. It sometimes takes a frustratingly long time, and doesn’t always get the desired result, but changes that come from this have a more lasting value.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Our à la carte Coalition President-Elect

Donald Trump won the presidency. He won by getting enough votes in enough states to carry the electoral college. It was a razor-thin upset, confounding predictions of the pundits. He won with no previous experience as an elected or appointed public servant.

People are scrambling to explain Trump’s victory and/or Clinton’s defeat, but overlook a key element to Trump’s success. Trump appealed to various blocks of voters making up a more diverse group than Clinton supporters. Hillary’s supporters were a traditional voting block – they basically bought Hillary’s whole package of policies and record of public service in preference to Trump, recognizing there may be some warts they weren’t crazy about, but could put up with, or could oppose or seek compromise down the line. With Hillary you ordered a set seven course meal, and probably had a pretty good idea of what you would get. You could leave the Brussel sprouts on the plate if you didn’t care for them.

Trump’s new kind of campaign capitalized on the diversity of his followers. He won the electoral Survivor game, catching Republican and Democratic opponents and pundits flat-footed. He won by coalition to become America’s first à la carte President. He has never seemed particularly Republican or conservative, but a wild card, befitting his name.  He would not have won if he had to rely solely on people who bought the whole package, in the traditional way of presenting a candidate followed by the Clinton campaign. Many Trump supporters say they voted for him, “but I’m not racist,” “I’m not a Trump supporter,” “I’m not in favor of [name your Trump issue you don’t agree/identify with].” Trump won with a coalition of Trump fans, Republican loyalists, Hillary haters, and the overlooked “third parties” of one-issue voters. Trump’s vague promises of making America great again never defined when and how we were great; people were allowed to fill in the blank and vote for their own individual concepts of a return to greatness, regardless of whether their views prove to bear any resemblance to Trump’s ultimate plans and actions. His won over a few small select groups, so staunch in their support for their main issue that it would “Trump” any other qualms they might have had about their candidate. Three groups in particular come to mind. If he had lost any of these one-issue groups, Clinton would have most likely won.

  1. Gun control opponents/NRA. Trump is less likely to propose any sort of gun control measures than Clinton would have been. This group probably already favored Trump for this issue. This doesn’t make them racists or fellow-travellers aligned with any other unsavory or dangerous aspects of the Trump platform. They weren’t duped – they just accepted all the rest of the baggage that comes with Trump, as long as the outcome for their issue came out more favorably than the likely outcomes from a Clinton presidency. Those whose love of the great outdoors led them to support the NRA endorsed candidate may live to regret increased impacts of human-induced global warming on their favorite hunting grounds and species, sped and exacerbated by Trump’s denial and minimization of the problem. This has been forecast by his selection of noted Climate Change sceptic, and Koch brothers-funded oil industry apologist, Myron Ebell to head the Environmental Protection Agency transition, oil industry ally and climate change denier Scott Pruitt to head the EPA, and short-listing Sarah “Drill-Baby-Drill!” Palin and Oklahoma Governor and oil and gas industry advocate Mary Fallin for Secretary of the Interior, in charge of America’s parks and public lands.
  2. Pro-Lifers got suckered. They are sincere and intense in their protection of the unborn. It’s questionable, however, whether Trump has any concern for unborn babies or their supporters beyond the votes they represented. If he had stuck to his previous Pro-Choice position, there would have been no percentage in it for him – Clinton has a solid, consistent, and active Pro-Choice record. She would garner more Pro-Choice votes than Trump. Pro-Lifers, given the choice of a Pro-Choice Clinton or Trump, would probably lean toward Clinton as a total package, or just stay home. Easy calculation: Trump flip-flops to Pro-Life, doubles down on promising to appoint activist, Pro-Lifers to the Supreme Court, and promises the “pie-in-the-sky-in-the-sweet-bye-and-bye” Holy Grail of overturning Roe vs. Wade. He probably never had the Pro-Choice votes anyway; he cleaned up on Pro-Life votes. This may also be a point (together with his selection of Mike Pence as VP, with Pence’s established Pro-Life and anti-LGBT record) that won Trump such a surprisingly high percentage of conservative Christian votes. Even if Trump appoints Pro-Life judges, it’s highly unlikely Roe vs. Wade gets overturned. Trump got the votes he needed and Pro-Lifers will likely get the shaft, on this issue and in general.
  3. White supremacists. Here’s a place I thought Trump was just playing percentages. David Duke’s vote counts just as much as Jesse Jackson’s (maybe more by electoral college weight). Trump wasn’t going to win many Democrats over by renouncing endorsements from racist groups or individuals. If he soft-pedaled it, this was a small, but not insignificant block of votes he could easily bag. Signs that he is actually giving power, influence, and tacit tolerant acceptance of Alt Right and white supremacist groups is very troubling. Choosing Steve Bannon as Chief Advisor, and nominating Jeff Sessions as Attorney General send frightening signals that Trump’s comfort level with racial intolerance may actually be the true picture of the man.

Problems with Trump’s à la carte victory:  Though Trump may have won the votes of a coalition, he has no need or incentive to govern as a traditional coalition leader. In countries with coalition governments, the various minority groups in the coalition all have votes and a degree of clout in parliament as political parties. They can actually break away from the coalition, transferring power to another ruling party. The United States lacks party representation in Congress for any of the very different Trump one-issue groups. Though individual legislators may sympathize with their views, there is no Pro-Life, NRA, Conservative Evangelical, or White Supremacist party that Trump has to answer to on a daily basis. He got a strong majority of his targeted one-issue votes. That’s all he needed.

Those who voted for Trump à la carte got more than they bargained for. We’re all now strapped in for a four-year, who-knows-how-many course, fixed menu meal served on a roller coaster. We don’t get to pick and choose just the things we liked about him or his message. We can’t send back a dish if we discover portions are overdone or half-baked. We won’t even get a choice about the metaphorical Brussels sprouts.

I fear what is likely to come from a Trump presidency. I fear for the environment, for civil rights, for tolerance, for tone, for freedom of the press, for the delicate balance of foreign relations. A lot is at stake over a myriad of critical issues that were tragically glossed over, avoided, or never addressed by either Trump, Clinton, or the media during the campaign. The nation and world are now forced to deal with the aftermath.

I also fear for rationalizing human nature. The reasons for a vote can get lost in defensive rationalizations that turn into partisan entrenchment that further breaks down our ability to honestly deal with separate issues and calmly discuss them with one another.

I’m angry at people who brought about Trump’s victory. This anger is totally different from disappointments at past presidential election results. If anyone other than Trump had ascended to the presidency, I’d be over it. My anger is based on my dread that with Trump we are embarking on paths that have led to tragic, cataclysmic consequences for the world in the past, and we are speeding forward on earth-altering patterns that humanity has never had to cope with before. I sincerely hope I’m wrong. If any of these feared outcomes are realized, we all lose, big-time.

Anger between opposing sides must not transform into hatred or estrangement. Jon Stewart eloquently expressed the idea that the people who voted for Trump can’t be lumped together as one united group. Trump voters can’t simply be dismissed as racist, stupid, or xenophobes, any more than those who voted for Clinton can be branded a group of “sore losers” or “liberal elitists.” A lot of tolerant, smart, caring people with sincere dedication to commonly-espoused causes voted for Trump or Clinton, whether out of enthusiasm for their candidate, dedication to their favorite causes or parties, or antipathy to the other candidate. One negative generalization of Trump supporters likely to prove true: they were marks of a master con artist.

For those clamoring “give Trump a chance, wait to see what he’ll do once in office,” Trump has already given a comprehensive preview during the campaign and since the election. Pay close attention to the appointment considerations  and first 100 days agenda  he’s already served up as an appetizer course. It’s a likely foretaste of the feast to come. Pay even closer attention after his inauguration if any of these issues concern you.

Appetizers

After all he’s said and done, Trump has a proven, extensive record as an unpredictable chameleon at best, or pathological liar and cheat at worst. It would take a miraculous transformation for him to earn any benefit of the doubt as to whether he’s acting in the best interests of the world and nation. The burden of proof of acting in good faith with decency, integrity, or competence is on him and his administration. They must demonstrate the fears they’ve raised, engendered, and exploited are overblown. They must work to prevent the forces and ideas they’ve empowered and set in motion from turning into deadly conflagrations. Trump’s actions and their potential and real effects demand the closest scrutiny, from his supporters and opponents alike. Many of his proposals can reasonably be perceived as grave potential threats to the world, the nation, to people categorized as “other,” and even to “white privileged voters” like me.

“By their fruits, shall ye know them” (Matt. 7: 16-20). I’m frightened by the seeds Trump has sown. Everyone should keep their eyes on the trees that grow. They’re likely to need some serious pruning of unhealthy fruit. Without careful management, they also have the potential to choke out a lot of things all of us hold dear, individually and collectively, including the ability to look one another in the eye without seeing enemies or victims.

Posted in Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

11/9

Some significant events that happened on or around November 9:

11/9/1938 – Kristallnacht, “The Night of Broken Glass.” Five years after Hitler is made Chancellor, gangs of his supporters roam the streets of Germany, terrorizing Jews.

“On November 9 to November 10, 1938, in an incident known as “Kristallnacht,” Nazis in Germany torched synagogues, vandalized Jewish homes, schools and businesses and killed close to 100 Jews. In the aftermath of Kristallnacht, also called the “Night of Broken Glass,” some 30,000 Jewish men were arrested and sent to Nazi concentration camps. German Jews had been subjected to repressive policies since 1933, when Nazi Party leader Adolf Hitler (1889-1945) became chancellor of Germany.” (http://www.history.com/topics/kristallnacht)

kristallnacht

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interior of Berlin’s Fasanenstrasse Synagogue, opened in 1912, after it was set on fire during Kristallnacht on November 9, 1938

11/9/1989 – the fall of the Berlin Wall. In the Aftermath of Germany’s loss in WWII, the country was partitioned into Eastern and Western Zones under the divided supervision of the Soviet Union and the Western Allies.

“On August 13, 1961, the Communist government of the German Democratic Republic (GDR, or East Germany) began to build a barbed wire and concrete “Antifascistischer Schutzwall,” or “antifascist bulwark,” between East and West Berlin. The official purpose of this Berlin Wall was to keep Western “fascists” from entering East Germany and undermining the socialist state, but it primarily served the objective of stemming mass defections from East to West. The Berlin Wall stood until November 9, 1989, when the head of the East German Communist Party announced that citizens of the GDR could cross the border whenever they pleased. That night, ecstatic crowds swarmed the wall. Some crossed freely into West Berlin, while others brought hammers and picks and began to chip away at the wall itself. To this day, the Berlin Wall remains one of the most powerful and enduring symbols of the Cold War.” (http://www.history.com/topics/cold-war/berlin-wall)

berlin09-1

11/9/2016 – US Presidential Election. Donald Trump wins a narrow electoral college victory and is declared President-Elect of the United States.

He promises to build a wall separating the United States from Mexico. He also promises to withdraw from the Paris Climate Accords and appoint climate sceptic, Myron Ebell, to the leadership of the Environmental Protection Agency. He promises to repeal the Affordable Care Act. He promises to enact more stringent immigration controls to exclude and deport unwanted refugees and immigrants. He will replace Democratic career politicians with his own cadre of Republican party careerists.

trump

Mr. Trump has been given the most powerful, influential office in the world, with no record of public service to enable us to predict what kind of leader he will be. He has been given this power with a negligibly low system of checks and balances, with Republican control of both houses of Congress. The Senate rigged the system further by delaying hearings (some say in dereliction of their constitutional duties) to fill a Supreme Court vacancy until the chance their chosen candidate would win the Presidency. Trump will be able to immediately appoint his promised deciding majority Supreme Court Justice. He will also probably be able to tilt the court further in his favor by choosing two additional justices before the end of his first term. Trump has near carte blanche impunity to pursue his agenda. Some results of his policies will be immediate; other effects may not be felt or realized for years. Many who voted for him did so in support of his stated positions and personality; others did so only because they believed him to be the lesser of two evils, and they doubt he’ll do all the things he said he would. We probably will never know what kind of President Hillary Clinton would have been. We’re about to find out about Donald Trump.

Two false assumptions exist about the possible dangers of a Trump administration: “It Can’t happen here,” and “It couldn’t get any worse.” It can and it could. Unthinkable things happened and got worse in the 1930’s in Germany. Things are deteriorating in many parts of the world that once had vibrant democratic traditions, high culture, and decent standards for quality of life and security for their citizens. Here and now, in the USA, many of our fellow citizens feel singled out by the rhetoric of the campaign, and fear for their lives and liberties in “The Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave.”

I do not believe the majority of Trump supporters voted for the marginalization or persecution of any of our citizens. I don’t believe most favored discrimination against women or minorities. I don’t think the majority is in favor of environmental degradation from reduced regulation of polluters. They are not all opposed to policies and efforts to mitigate or reverse effects of global warming.

Those who opposed Trump do fear these these problems as the potential national and global consequences of this election. Trump opponents will shine a light on any abuses, and fight all the harder to find solutions for threats to the  environment, civil rights violations, crippling health care and insurance costs, and a host of other issues. Those who supported Trump’s candidacy, or who stood on the sidelines as if this choice didn’t matter, should take special responsibility to assuage these fears of Trump’s opponents by their actions going forward. They should be among the first to speak out against any injustices or outrages that might be perpetrated at the behest of or in the name of Donald Trump.

Regardless of who we voted for, we must all do our utmost to hold Trump, the Congress, and the Courts accountable to the high standards set forth by the Constitution, as well as to what should be our shared standards and aspirations as a nation to ideals of decency, freedom, and justice.

We the People are the only remaining checks and balances to what we are willing to allow and accept from our new President and political leaders. We are all responsible for the kind of walls we build up or tear down, and for how we treat each other. It is up to us, starting now, to decide what kind of future lies ahead, and how the consequences of this 11/9 will play out and be remembered.

Posted in Politics | Leave a comment

Vote for Yourself

This election is ultimately about who we are, not who the candidates are or what they will do. The issues that the victors for any office will face in the coming years will have nothing to do with the non-issues, personal assaults, and shifting polls that dominate the campaign headlines and divert our focus from this central truth.

You’re ultimately voting for yourself.

What kind of person are you and what kind of world do you want to work for, for now and the future? What possibilities are you ready to open up or foreclose? Quite a statement gets made by you Nov. 8.

My dad, Arlen Erdahl, held a variety of elective and appointed government posts. He sometimes closed his political speeches with this little story:

A cynic wanted to stump a man famed for his wisdom and understanding with a question where the answer could be changed to contradict whatever the wise man answered. He held a small bird hidden in his hand. He would ask the wise man if it was alive or dead – if the wise man said “dead,” he would release the bird to fly away; if the wise man said “alive,” he would snap the bird’s neck.

When confronted and asked the question, the wise man replied, “It’s in your hands.”

Vote wisely. The future of the world is in your hands.

white_throated_sparrow-1

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

What Can One Person Do?

This was my first foray into the blogosphere, as a guest on Emily E. Hogstad’s “Song of the Lark” blog, back on Dec. 17, 2012. I reported from my spur-of-the-moment, one person protest picketing of the Minnesota Orchestral Association’s Board meeting, and made a case that one person can make a difference for positive change. It’s amazing the transformation that has taken place in the span of less than three years, both on the board, and in the orchestra and community. The Minnesota Orchestra is back, stronger, and more deeply rooted in firm community connections than ever before. The future is bright! Thanks to all the individual and collective voices and efforts that came together to make this possible!

What Can One Person Do?

Posted in Orchestra Lockouts in Minnesota | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

SISU! A Call for Heroes

When asked which of his symphonies was his favorite, Beethoven replied “Eroica.” Beethoven named his Symphony No. 3 “Eroica,” meaning “heroic.” He perhaps favored this piece because it is one of a handful of the most revolutionary, transformative, empowering pieces ever written.

In Eroica, Beethoven personalized music. Music was no longer simply an entertainment, or even a brilliantly constructed sound artifact. It transcended sound and became a statement from the composer about himself and about the human condition. It was one of the moments in musical history that impacted world history, ushering in the Romantic era with a bold, full-blown proclamation of the intrinsic value, heroism, and purpose of the artist and the individual.  In his PBS program, Keeping Score, Conductor Michael Tilson Thomas concludes,

The Eroica explores what it means to be human. In facing his own demons and choosing to continue making music, to continue living, Beethoven embraced the heroic in everyman and, ultimately, in himself.

Eroica is an apt double-bookend for the double-lockout of the Minnesota Orchestra and St. Paul Chamber Orchestra. It was one of the last things heard before both Orchestras were locked out when the SPCO played it, followed a couple weeks later by their gripping performance of Richard Strauss’s Metamorphosen, his tragic deconstruction of Eroica, mourning WW II’s destruction of German musical institutions. That SPCO performance resonates as one of the greatest Eroicas I have ever heard, despite, or perhaps because of, being performed in the face of the looming lockouts. In between Eroicas, the locked out musicians of both orchestras performed lots of music with powerful symbolic meaning (Sibelius Finlandia and Vals Triste), irreplaceable cultural touchstones (Handel’s Messiah, Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony), and moments of sheer, compelling beauty (Bruckner and Sibelius Symphonies, Mozart Clarinet Concerto). But something about Eroica refuses to be silenced and serves as a perfect triumphant return to music making. It’s entirely appropriate and significant that this magnificent, heroic work marked the return of the Minnesota Orchestra to the Orchestra Hall stage.

Like Beethoven’s personification of heroism in Eroica, the conductors, musicians, and audiences of the Minnesota Orchestra personalized music throughout the lockout in the face of seemingly unsurmountable odds through their courageous perseverance in performing music and reaching people to maintain and advance the artistic, educational, and societal missions of the Minnesota Orchestra.

On Friday, February 7, it was great to see and hear the Musicians of the Minnesota Orchestra at Orchestra Hall again, but the end of the lockout does not equal an end to challenges facing the orchestra. The sounds from the stage were generally good. Heroism was present, but more the heroism of battle survivors gathering to raise a torn and bloodied flag. Skrowaczewski inspired with his energy, interpretation, and historical involvement with the orchestra. But the concert was more a celebration of the end of the lockout and return to music-making, than a convincing return of the orchestra in top form. Something was missing. In walking around the lobby, it was clear nerves were still rubbed raw. Board members, musicians, and management milled about, but attempts at mingling were often strained, thwarted, rebuffed, or avoided. Only 55 of the 89 musicians on stage were regular members of the orchestra, and despite the capable play of 34 substitute musicians, it was made patently clear the players of the Minnesota Orchestra are not easily replaceable cogs. The sheer joy and shimmering virtuosity the orchestra had attained before the lockout and in transcendent lockout concerts were not quite there, and it can’t be blamed on altered acoustics. There used to be an ineffable synergy that made Vänskä and his full cadre of players add up to more than the sum of their individual, world-class parts. Healing has to happen, and it will take heroic efforts from all sides to reattain that greatness.

Heroism has been evidenced in the way the musicians had endured tremendous hardships and persevered through the lockout, in how a wide variety of community action groups came together and donated hours of passionate effort and thousands of dollars to work to end the lockout, and in the actions of the Board members who came to the bargaining table and cooperated to hammer out the agreement that finally ended the lockout. More heroism is needed if the Minnesota Orchestra is to survive and recover from damage that’s been done, remain a potent and vital core of our cultural life, and hopefully return to past glories. We all need to raise and answer “A Call for Heroes.”

That call was answered with resounding shouts March 27-29 when Osmo Vänskä returned to conduct sold-out concerts celebrating the orchestra’s recent Grammy win with performances of Sibelius Symphonies 1 and 4. Audiences were treated to the fullest complement of the orchestra’s musicians since the lockout, with many musicians returning just for this concert from commitments the lockout had forced them to make elsewhere around the globe. The performances were spectacularly gripping, moving, virtuosic, and heroic, from Vänskä and every individual performer on stage. The heroic audience that stood by and supported the players through the lockout voiced their support through a ragged cry of ‘Osmo!” followed by a good five minutes of unison hand clapping to an empty stage anticipating the reunion of Vänskä and the orchestra. Many waved Finnish flags, or wore the blue and white colors of the flag as a call to rehire Vänskä, and green scarves, hankies, and lapel pins in support of the musicians. The heroic actions of the audience, orchestra, and Vänskä transcended flag-waving enthusiasm in an embodiment of the Finnish ideal of Sisu. According to Wikipedia:

Sisu is a Finnish word generally meaning determination, bravery, and resilience. However, the word is widely considered to lack a proper translation into any other language. Sisu is about taking action against the odds and displaying courage and resoluteness in the face of adversity.

Heroism kept hope and music alive during the lockouts. Conductors almost never risk careers and engagements by embroiling themselves in labor disputes, but past and present conductors of the Minnesota Orchestra have spoken and acted with unprecedented unanimity and unwavering opposition to the tactics and goals of the MOA’s lockout of the musicians. Musicians endured a 16 month fight for the orchestra’s future, suffering lost salaries, health benefits, security, homes, and even lost the certainty a job worth performing would remain. Audience members, community action groups, bloggers, and some members of the MOA board have, often at high personal cost, stood up to say and do what was needed to end the lockout and begin the healing.

Though we all have to work to get past this, numerous mistakes were made by the MOA leadership. The musicians and community don’t need the MOA wallowing in perpetual hand-wringing and penitential sack-cloth and ashes, but these mistakes must be acknowledged and redressed if there is to be any hope for the future. True repentance is needed in its literal biblical meaning of “turning away from the evil that was done and taking a new path.” The MOA should not waste time or energy denying mistakes were made. They should not excuse harms done, regardless of any good intentions that may have paved the roads to Hell that hurt many people, deprived audiences of an orchestral season, and threatened the very existence of the orchestra. Neither “I was only following orders,” nor “I only did what I was hired to do,” nor “It’s just about the money” are acceptable exonerations. The MOA must lead and they must rebuild burnt bridges. Under new MOA Board Chair Gordon Sprenger’s leadership, the MOA has come a long way.

Human relations primer

Sprenger took the most important heroic first step was when the word, “sorry,” was finally uttered in his opening remarks to the orchestra after the lockout. It meant an awful lot to the musicians to hear that. It was not an all-encompassing repudiation of all that had gone before, or even a promise of specific actions or changed directions. It was just a very human and humane thing to say, to acknowledge hurt had been taken and hardships had been endured. In response to this step and what has followed, “thank you,” best wishes, and support are due to Mr. Sprenger. Sprenger’s second heroic decision ended Michael Henson’s tenure with the orchestra. This was heroic, especially considering the board decisions that initially put Henson and his policies in place, followed by unflagging support of Henson and his views from many Board members past the end of the lockout. This action had tangible costs to the MOA when, in protest of Henson’s removal, a group of eight Board members resigned, taking their money with them, on the eve of Osmo’s return to conduct the Orchestra celebrating their Grammy win. The third courageous decision and action was convincing the board to ask for Osmo’s return as Music Director, coupled with negotiating a meaningful return package with Vänskä. Even though to many this seemed the only rational and feasible choice for this time and situation, every facet of the process had to take heroic diplomacy from all parties to make it possible.

Next needed step: The MOA must reexamine and revamp their governance structure. Good starting points might be to seek and invite answers from outside their ranks. This most critically includes orchestral musicians, but also requires engagement of the community. Read, reflect on, and act on suggestions from Bill Eddins’ brilliant Something Old, New, Borrowed, and Blue State, and apply SOSPCO’s thoughtful Guiding Principles to the Minnesota Orchestra situation. Invite community representatives to the table from Save our Symphony Minnesota and Orchestrate Excellence, or from the public at large. Formalize ways for the musicians and community to have meaningful partnership roles on the Minnesota Orchestra Board.

A recommended further step is to pull out all the stops to find a way to complete the Minnesota Orchestra’s historically important recordings of the Sibelius Symphony cycle. If this can’t be accomplished, it will go down as one of most tragic losses to posterity of the 16 month lockout. Invite back key musicians who have left the orchestra to participate in the recording sessions. Give BIS whatever assurances and technical assistance they need to bring them back to record. Mount an aggressive fund raising appeal dedicated to completing these recordings, buoyed by the recent Grammy win together with the palpable audience enthusiasm for what happens when Vänskä conducts Sibelius with the Minnesota Orchestra.

We are truly “all in this together,” so it’s no longer about who “wins,” it’s about who leads in a compelling fashion. We need solid leadership from the CEO and from the podium, and we need involvement from the community. Neither Henson’s departure nor Vänskä’s return provides a magic cure. Remarkable leadership, artistic insight, meaningful gestures of conciliation to players and public, and an effective game plan for the future are needed. Vänskä has proven his leadership through taking the orchestra to great heights. His return makes it more likely that great players on leave, together with disillusioned former supporters, may consider coming back. That sort of leadership also has to arise on the MOA Board and in the front office.

Back in December of 2012, Emily Hogstad posted my guest blog, “What can one person do?” on her amazing Song of the Lark site. The blog concluded with a list of things one person could to to affect positive change in the face of the lockout. Musicians, conductors, audiences, and members of the MOA Board have already shown heroism, ranging from glimmers to shining beacons. We need to keep it coming. Here’s my post-lockout revised one-person heroic to-do list, intended for all parties to apply as it fits their situation, to help the Minnesota Orchestra recover and thrive.

1) Say you’re sorry. If you think anyone has suffered hurt or perceived slights from your words or actions, this applies to you.
2) Don’t bear grudges. This applies to everyone.
3) Keep informed. Read current and back postings from dedicated and informed local sources: The Song of the Lark, Mask of the Flower Prince, Sticks and Drones, Save Our Symphony Minnesota, Orchestrate Excellence, Low Rumblings, or their respective Facebook or other social media pages.
4) Get to know a musician, board member, staff person, other concert goers.
5) Pitch in. Contribute to the Minnesota Orchestra and let them know what they’ve done to inspire you to get back on board as a supporter. Volunteer as an usher. Donate to music education initiatives. Vote for that referendum that keep the arts from being cut in your school district. Help commission a new composition.
6) Participate. GO TO CONCERTS!!! Join YPSCA, FOMO, Young Musicians of MinnesotaSOSMN, Orchestrate Excellence, Minnesota Citizens for the Arts. Dust off your old instrument and join a community orchestra.  Write a letter to an editor or legislator.  Go to Arts Advocacy Day at the Capitol.
7) Spread the good news. Treat some friends to a concert. Share a link about a performance you really liked or are looking forward to. Write a blog!
8) Be patient, with firm, optimistic views of what the future can hold.
9) Be heroic.

The ultimate answer out of this mess is in the original definition of “Symphony” — Sounding together “in an agreement or concord of sound.” Many players in orchestras may not get along personally, but they put it aside to perform together so spectacular music can happen. It’s time for all parties to get to business and work in symphony, following the spirit and example of the players and the music.
“Three Heroic Symphonies, One Dangerous False Premise, and a Solution Defined.”

SISU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted in Orchestra Lockouts in Minnesota | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

The End is Near! Happy New Year!

I Was Wrong

I played bass in a recent impressive Christmas performance at a church where, in past years, they actually hired the Minnesota Orchestra for the program. As I left, a woman asked if the lockout was any nearer resolution. This was shortly after the Minnesota Orchestral Association (MOA) Board’s annual meeting, where they essentially voted to stay the course: “At the Board’s request, Jon Campbell agreed to be reelected to serve as chair through the conclusion of the labor dispute. Immediate Past Chair [and Negotiating Committee Chair] Richard Davis will also serve through the conclusion of the labor dispute.” The Musicians of the Minnesota Orchestra had just announced their own self-produced spring season. The sides seemed, if anything, more entrenched than ever. My pessimistic reply to the concerned concert-goer was, “Things don’t seem to be getting any closer to a resolution. There’s no end in sight.” I’m not a member of the Orchestra, but I’ve followed the situation closely, blogged, and worked with community groups fighting to save the orchestra. I really didn’t and don’t have any inside information to convey, but I think I was wrong in my initial bleak assessment.

The End is Near!

the end is near

When things are as unstable, unsupportable, and “unsustainable” as the situation between the MOA and the Musicians of the Minnesota Orchestra, change is never gradual. Pressures of this sort are almost geological in scale, and reach equilibrium only after sudden eruptions, earthquakes, landslides, or other events that alter the landscape dramatically. I have experienced sudden, dramatic change elsewhere. On a musical research trip into Leipzig, East Germany, I made friends eager to meet and talk with people “from outside.” They were demoralized by the seemingly impervious power of the East German Government, with no hope of ever getting out from under the thumb of the regime. When I said, “Things can change,” they shook their heads in melancholy thanks and dismissal of my naive optimism. Less than a year later, pieces of Berlin Wall rubble were being sold as souvenirs. A few years later, another immovable object yielded to irresistible force. Most in South Africa and the rest of the world believed Apartheid was too entrenched to fall, and Nelson Mandela would die in prison. That he would be released and become President of his country in a peaceful revolution was inconceivable. Even more unbelievable was the scenario that played out as bitter enmities and divisions were healed through a process of “truth and reconciliation.”

The Power is with the People

The people of Minnesota want, need, and have supported The Minnesota Orchestra through more than one hundred years. The current impasse is unacceptable and will not be tolerated much longer. A friend described the legacy of the core support of the orchestra as “a bunch of Swedish farmers that wanted a brighter future for their kids.” These were the people (of all nationalities) who founded colleges, acapella choirs, learned to play the fiddle, and bought pipe organs for their churches. Of the many great and generous patrons through the years, most were people of ordinary means who believed they could build “The Good Life” for themselves and their descendants in Minnesota. The average patron of the Minnesota Orchestra bears more resemblance to Pa Ingalls than to James J. Hill, though thousands of folks like them and between shouldered the responsibility to support the arts to the best of their means and abilities. When this “Good Life” is threatened, it should come as no surprise when individual, community, institutional, and corporate patrons take matters into their own hands to end and change intolerable situations.

The voice of the people is heard in all its diversity in community groups, individual actions, blogs, social media, legislative hearings, traditional media, letters to the editor, and coffee shop conversations. The voices comes from Minnesotans and classical music fans and authorities from around the world. Our local trouble has become the international central topic of conversation when the future of orchestral music is discussed. It is also held up by musicians, managements, and music lovers as an example of how not to run an orchestra. The only place these voices seem to lack traction is among the non-responsive leadership of the MOA.

The Musicians are Doing their Job

The Musicians of the Minnesota Orchestra are making music and making a case for the role of an orchestra in our community. It’s not just a collection of rag-tag, patched-together events either. The locked-out concerts of the 2013 were sold-out, intergenerational celebrations of the appeal of great music and musicians and the love shared between them and their audiences. Ask anyone who attended! Great music was made that mattered and that will be remembered for a lifetime. Going ahead into 2014 the musicians have put together an impressive “Season of Shining Stars” including the return of Vänskä, a celebration of their second consecutive Sibelius Symphony Grammy nomination, and performances by household-name musical luminaries Itzhak Perlman and Joshua Bell. In addition, the Musicians have put together educational events for the schools and for the local El Sistema program to share the power of music with people of all ages and economic backgrounds.

The MOA has Failed

The MOA has not fulfilled their responsibilities as stewards of the living tradition of great music or of the Minnesota Orchestra. Many frequently overuse the word “Stewardship,” and under-achieve fulfillment of its obligations. (An Orchestra is an Instrument. Thoughts on Stewardship.) It’s impossible to judge the motivations of others. But when the consequences of those actions are indistinguishable from what we’d expect from someone Hell-bent on destroying the cultural fabric of the state, the perpetrators have to be stopped. The MOA has not fulfilled its responsibility to protect, promote, and preserving a great Orchestra, and all that means far beyond the concert hall. What has been done to the Minnesota Orchestra amounts to cultural vandalism on the scale of taking a sledgehammer to Michelangelo’s Pietà. It will also take more time, money, and hard work to reverse and repair the damage than was the case with Michelangelo’s masterpiece. Once the damage is repaired, nobody knows what events or how much time it will take to restore trust in the MOA’s good intentions and competence.

The MOA’s relatively meager and pops-heavy future plans for the Orchestra inspire little confidence. Michael Henson outlined these plans in Exhibit A, pp. 6-7 of a letter to the City of Minneapolis, claiming the MOA “will continue to work diligently to provide additional music in accordance with our programming obligations and agreements with the city.” (See also Doug Grow’s MinnPost article of 12/4/13.) “There is no ‘there’ there,” if one hopes to find a rationale, responsible path forward with a chance of artistic success in the MOA’s short and long range plans and actions.

The MOA has damaged more than the Orchestra. They hamstrung enthusiastic and long-serving volunteer organizations that have worked for generations on behalf of the Minnesota Orchestra, including Friends of the Minnesota Orchestra (formerly WAMSO), and YPSCA, the Young People’s Symphony Concert Association. These organizations’ efforts to further the education of young people through outreach and scholarships have been sharply curtailed or silenced. Fundraising and membership drives are hampered by the lack of an outlet for their core purposes of sharing the gift of music with the next generation of performers and concert goers. The MOA has hurt area businesses. They have given a black eye to the reputation of the Twin Cities and Minnesota as vibrant, attractive artistic environments. They have severely damaged public trust in their abilities, vision, and honesty, alienating politicians, donors, concert-goers, musicians, and defaming and undervaluing their “product” and its wider impact to the non-concert-going public. Playing Chicken . . . or Not, argues they made themselves irrelevant.

It’s not about the money. The MOA complains that old reliable sources of funding are drying up. That’s been happening since the concept of money was invented. New money has always come along and been courted and collected for the support of art. Money has come from the church, Medicis, Esterhazys, nobility, a rising middle class, Swedish farmers in Minnesota, new media like recordings, radio, and TV, and new billionaires and breakthrough technologies. I played in the new World Symphony in Miami Beach. This orchestra was largely funded by a record-breaking $30 million gift from Ted and Lyn Arison of Carnival Cruise Lines. The chips in most of your cell phones literally owe a debt to Qualcomm’s founder and president, Irwin Jacobs, who surpassed the Arison’s donation when he gave $100 million to the San Diego Symphony in 2002. In Minnesota, we have had long-term generous support from many visionary philanthropists. In recent years, Ken and Judy Dayton provided a lion’s share of support for the Minnesota Orchestra. That’s good money, but it’s also old, connected to earnings from the Hudson Bay Company, founded in 1670, North America’s longest continually operated company. There’s new money in Minnesota too, and past MOA fundraisers have found it. Before he became our US Senator. Rudy Boschwitz and his company, Plywood Minnesota, provided the rugs for Minnesota Orchestra’s blue-jeans Rug Concerts in the 70s and 80s. These fun, engaging concerts brought new audiences and donors to classical music as a direct result of aggressive and creative marketing conceived by MOA Executive Director Dick Cisek. These concerts worked out very well for both the Orchestra and Plywood Minnesota. Boschwitz, a former French horn player, also subsequently served on the Orchestra Board. It is the job of fund-raisers in arts organizations to be “very aggressive and creative.” The MOA has shown very little creativity through the past five years, and their aggressions have been mistakenly directed against their musicians and audiences.

What Will Tip the Scales?

We need great music, we want it, and we will support it. We also know what we want, and won’t settle for substandard substitutes. In a recent web posting, the community group, Orchestrate Excellence posed the question, “What is a World-Class Orchestra?” E. Hogstad eloquently responded, “I don’t want a world-class orchestra; I want this world-class orchestra…meaning, the musicians who make up the Minnesota Orchestra. Everything in our power should be done to keep every man and woman who is still onstage, onstage, here in Minnesota. Every musician who finds more fulfilling work elsewhere is a black mark against Minnesota and the leaders of the Minnesota Orchestral Association.” Minnesota needs the Minnesota Orchestra.

The MOA retains a slippery grasp on only one card: One of the largest orchestral endowments in America. If the city, state, or other members of the board determine the current leadership is misusing that trust and that money, it’s conceivable a way will be found to have the money follow the music it was meant to support, and that the Musicians of the Minnesota Orchestra continued to provide.

There are bigger fish that have the power to influence Henson, Davis, Campbell, and the other members of the board. Pressure and “leverage” can be applied to CEOs, Executive Directors, and Board leaders, as well as to musicians. Warren Buffet recently upped his ante in Wells Fargo Stocks. MOA Board Chair Jon Cambell is also Executive Vice President and Director of Government and Community Relations, Wells Fargo Bank. Campbell might change his tune if Mr. Buffet voiced concerns about potential damage to the Wells Fargo image, profits, and valuations due to actions of their “Director of Government and Community Relations” in the lockout of the Minnesota Orchestra. Many people serve on the MOA Board as representatives of their corporation’s benevolence. If their active or tacit support of MOA actions is perceived as harmful to the Orchestra, it’s entirely possible corporate boards and shareholders might induce MOA Board members to reverse course.

The money the MOA is talking about is chump change. $6 million sounds like a lot, but it is not that big a deal. When a music-loving retired Executive of one of Minnesota’s Fortune 500 companies heard that was the stumbling block deficit figure, he said, “Is that all? Our company could cover that in one check.” Negotiating Committee Chair Richard Davis had enough take-home pay last year to cover that amount twice over, and still have 5 or 6 million to spare. On a smaller scale, $6 million could be covered by an average annual contribution of a little over one dollar from each Minnesotan, or an average of around $2 from each resident of the Twin Cities area. On a larger scale, Minnesota has the second highest per capita concentration of Fortune 500 companies in the nation. There is money in the area. A recent Star Tribune article discussing changes in philanthropy recalled Ken Dayton saying, “If I think enough of you to make a big contribution, then I have to believe you know how to best use it.” When people regain trust that whoever is at the helm of the MOA “knows how to best use it,” support from donors old and new can resume, and help bring back the music. The means are here to make it happen, potentially in very short order, from few and/or many sources.

There are better business plans out there for running an orchestra. All of these call for more of a system of checks and balances, and give more of a voice to the musicians and audiences. Conductor/pianist/blogger Bill Eddins, formerly Associate Conductor of the Minnesota Orchestra, came up with one of the most comprehensive and well-informed plans in Something Old, New, Borrowed, and Blue State. The community group Save Our SPCO came also up with a set of Guiding Principles that should be considered in the evolution of any orchestra’s governance structure.

Soon, some or all of these forces will come together, some straw will break the camel’s back, and a voice will be heard proclaiming the Emperors New Clothes don’t cover what needs to happen. People will hear, understand, and act. A better day will return.

Predictions for the Future of the Minnesota Orchestra:

Most people probably share a similar scenario of what seems reasonable and likely as an ultimate settlement. Some third party will probably have to provide mediation. Both musicians and management will have to take some short-term pay cuts and make some concessions. Unlike the MOA proposals, these cuts will be coupled with a plan to gradually return to competitive salaries within a few years through “very aggressive and creative” marketing and fundraising. Some changes in leadership and direction will have to come from the MOA. The endowment will somehow get back together with the musicians and the music. Audiences and musicians will play bigger roles in decision-making; musicians with more say in artistic matters, and audiences with a place at the table, providing a reasonable system of checks and balances. Making great orchestral art will drive the process, served by “very aggressive and creative” ways to build audience and raise funds to help make the music happen.

The Hardest and Most Important Thing to Fix:

Wounds must be healed. Hurtful things have been said and harmful things have been done by people who all along should have been on the same team. After whatever cataclysm ends the impasse between musicians and management, forgiveness must be asked and grace granted to all who can find a way to work together. Desmond Tutu’s reflections on “Truth and Reconciliation” in South Africa inspire hope we can find a way forward. The future health of the Minnesota Orchestra depends on all our talents, abilities, vision, involvement, and generosity. Despite the current sub-zero temperatures, a rapid thaw and fruitful collaborations yielding renewed greatness can and must come soon. Happy New Year!

Posted in Orchestra Lockouts in Minnesota | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments